+case "$ARCH$SUBARCH" in
+arm) ASMSUBARCH=el ;;
+*) ASMSUBARCH=$SUBARCH ;;
+esac
+
+#
+# Some archs (powerpc) have different possible long double formats
+# that the compiler can be configured for. The logic for whether this
+# is supported is in bits/float.h; in general, it is not. We need to
+# check for mismatches here or code in printf, strotd, and scanf will
+# be dangerously incorrect because it depends on (1) the macros being
+# correct, and (2) IEEE semantics.
+#
+printf "checking whether compiler's long double definition matches float.h... "
+echo '#include <float.h>' > "$tmpc"
+echo '#if LDBL_MANT_DIG == 53' >> "$tmpc"
+echo 'typedef char ldcheck[9-(int)sizeof(long double)];' >> "$tmpc"
+echo '#endif' >> "$tmpc"
+if $CC $CFLAGS_C99FSE -I./arch/$ARCH -I./include $CPPFLAGS $CFLAGS \
+ -c -o /dev/null "$tmpc" >/dev/null 2>&1 ; then
+printf "yes\n"
+else
+printf "no\n"
+fail "$0: error: unsupported long double type"
+fi
+
+#
+# Check for known bug in GCC 4.9.0 that results in a broken libc.
+#
+if test "$cc_is_gcc" = yes ; then
+printf "checking for gcc constant folding bug with weak aliases... "
+echo 'static int x = 0;' > "$tmpc"
+echo 'extern int y __attribute__((__weak__, __alias__("x")));' >> "$tmpc"
+echo 'extern int should_appear;' >> "$tmpc"
+echo 'int foo() { return y ? should_appear : 0; }' >> "$tmpc"
+case "$($CC $CFLAGS_C99FSE -I./arch/$ARCH -I./include \
+ $CPPFLAGS $CFLAGS_AUTO $CFLAGS -S -o - "$tmpc" 2>/dev/null)" in
+*should_appear*)
+printf "no\n"
+;;
+*)
+printf "yes\n"
+fail "$0: error: broken compiler; try CFLAGS=-fno-toplevel-reorder"
+;;
+esac
+fi
+