From: Rich Felker <dalias@aerifal.cx>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 23:04:24 +0000 (-0400)
Subject: asm for memmove on i386 and x86_64
X-Git-Url: http://nsz.repo.hu/git/?p=musl;a=commitdiff_plain;h=2bf469310de6793228c103691859ed4d3158b117;hp=a9555a995cea8aa67da571c95af61109140f2c8d

asm for memmove on i386 and x86_64

for the sake of simplicity, I've only used rep movsb rather than
breaking up the copy for using rep movsd/q. on all modern cpus, this
seems to be fine, but if there are performance problems, there might
be a need to go back and add support for rep movsd/q.
---

diff --git a/src/string/i386/memmove.s b/src/string/i386/memmove.s
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..6e6cc8e3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/string/i386/memmove.s
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+.global memmove
+.type memmove,@function
+memmove:
+	mov 4(%esp),%eax
+	sub 8(%esp),%eax
+	cmp 12(%esp),%eax
+	jae memcpy
+	push %esi
+	push %edi
+	mov 12(%esp),%edi
+	mov 16(%esp),%esi
+	mov 20(%esp),%ecx
+	lea -1(%edi,%ecx),%edi
+	lea -1(%esi,%ecx),%esi
+	std
+	rep movsb
+	cld
+	lea 1(%edi),%eax
+	pop %edi
+	pop %esi
+	ret
diff --git a/src/string/x86_64/memmove.s b/src/string/x86_64/memmove.s
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..247f0ac3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/string/x86_64/memmove.s
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+.global memmove
+.type memmove,@function
+memmove:
+	mov %rdi,%rax
+	sub %rsi,%rax
+	cmp %rdx,%rax
+	jae memcpy
+	mov %rdx,%rcx
+	lea -1(%rdi,%rdx),%rdi
+	lea -1(%rsi,%rdx),%rsi
+	std
+	rep movsb
+	cld
+	lea 1(%rdi),%rax
+	ret