improve/debloat mutex unlock error checking in pthread_cond_wait
authorRich Felker <dalias@aerifal.cx>
Tue, 27 Sep 2011 22:22:31 +0000 (18:22 -0400)
committerRich Felker <dalias@aerifal.cx>
Tue, 27 Sep 2011 22:22:31 +0000 (18:22 -0400)
we're not required to check this except for error-checking mutexes,
but it doesn't hurt. the new test is actually simpler/lighter, and it
also eliminates the need to later check that pthread_mutex_unlock
succeeds.

src/thread/pthread_cond_timedwait.c

index faa7c23..60ebbb9 100644 (file)
@@ -37,8 +37,8 @@ int pthread_cond_timedwait(pthread_cond_t *c, pthread_mutex_t *m, const struct t
        struct cm cm = { .c=c, .m=m };
        int r, e=0, seq;
 
-       if ((m->_m_type&3) == PTHREAD_MUTEX_ERRORCHECK &&
-               (m->_m_lock&INT_MAX) != __pthread_self()->tid) return EPERM;
+       if (m->_m_type && (m->_m_lock&INT_MAX) != __pthread_self()->tid)
+               return EPERM;
 
        if (ts && ts->tv_nsec >= 1000000000UL)
                return EINVAL;
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ int pthread_cond_timedwait(pthread_cond_t *c, pthread_mutex_t *m, const struct t
 
        seq = c->_c_seq;
 
-       if ((r=pthread_mutex_unlock(m))) return r;
+       pthread_mutex_unlock(m);
 
        do e = __timedwait(&c->_c_seq, seq, c->_c_clock, ts, cleanup, &cm, 0);
        while (c->_c_seq == seq && (!e || e==EINTR));