From: Götz Lindenmaier <goetz@ipd.info.uni-karlsruhe.de>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 12:28:01 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: why not?
X-Git-Url: http://nsz.repo.hu/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=f6e0c332bd3172d2f12c0c50dba351e6a4c513c5;p=libfirm

why not?

[r5290]
---

diff --git a/ir/tr/entity_t.h b/ir/tr/entity_t.h
index a9842c71d..6f7a55267 100644
--- a/ir/tr/entity_t.h
+++ b/ir/tr/entity_t.h
@@ -219,13 +219,17 @@ __get_entity_peculiarity(const entity *ent) {
 }
 
 /**
- * @todo why peculiarity only for methods
+ * @todo Why peculiarity only for methods?
+ *       Good question.  Originally, there were only description and
+ *       existent.  The thought was, what sense does it make to
+ *       describe a field?  With inherited the situation changed.  So
+ *       I removed the assertion.  GL, 28.2.05
  */
 static INLINE void
 __set_entity_peculiarity(entity *ent, peculiarity pec) {
   assert(ent && ent->kind == k_entity);
   /* @@@ why peculiarity only for methods? */
-  assert(is_Method_type(ent->type));
+  //assert(is_Method_type(ent->type));
 
   ent->peculiarity = pec;
 }