Don't use consecutive numbers for basic blocks from different functions.
authorManuel Mohr <manuel.mohr@kit.edu>
Mon, 13 Aug 2012 12:44:00 +0000 (14:44 +0200)
committerManuel Mohr <manuel.mohr@kit.edu>
Mon, 13 Aug 2012 12:44:00 +0000 (14:44 +0200)
commite18f885674418c8525117a3e2805bc6a1e3f9b33
tree0571412396ce90924d74837609131f6eb3b2a985
parent2fae02ed33d1d18ef852ccbee3b420bb600b0b41
Don't use consecutive numbers for basic blocks from different functions.

Consecutive numbers can make it difficult to combine assembly output from
different compiler runs, which is done by the check/checkfile scripts to find
bugs in the SPEC suite.  If the number of basic blocks of a function changed
between compiler runs, the assembler will likely complain about duplicate labels.
Leaving a bit more space, e.g. 100, is a pragmatic fix.
ir/be/begnuas.c