X-Git-Url: http://nsz.repo.hu/git/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=TODO;h=510490c3a8e7cd62f8f9c494f54bc13d72e3b4f5;hb=374f4042065f1aee975185d93612701b53ccba9a;hp=657f26916e8a90a6d9a6d0d0b9d337359256673e;hpb=1eb5cfdef7738a56043fd4d9692c329c97582119;p=cparser diff --git a/TODO b/TODO index 657f269..510490c 100644 --- a/TODO +++ b/TODO @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ Refactoring: - create an empty_statement_t and use that instead of a NULL pointer in places like if, loop bodys, statements after labels +- eliminate target_architecture.h and replace with stuff in lang_features.h +- redo storage classes: so we can separate real from declared storage class Lexer: - Add preprocessor code @@ -9,22 +11,27 @@ Lexer: compressed table) and only storing pointers to it on the AST. Parser: +- disallow storage class specifiers in sturct/union members - the expect macros abort functions directly. This leads to some functions - not resetting the current context properly (parse_for) + not resetting the current context properly (parse_for); expect in expressions + suddenly return NULL which triggers asserts - label: declaration; is no valid C99 but we parse it anyway -- designator support for initializers -- add constant folding code -- Refactor code, so code to handle number values and strings is - an own module and replacable +- add constant folding code (optional, ast2firm already does it) +- Refactor code, so code to handle number values (and strings?) is an own + module and replacable - Support some attributes. noreturn, unused, printf, scanf, packed would be interesting candidates +- Add columns to source positions - SourcePositions could be stored selectively on expressions that really need them. +- check semantic for functions declared/defined in global scope and declared + again in a local scope +- print initialisation type_path for initializer errors ast2firm: +- handle non-constant initializers - output source file positions for panics... -- output variable names for uninitialized variable warnings -- handle bitfield members with 0 correctly (standard says this finished the +- handle bitfield members with 0 correctly (standard says they finish the current unit) Missing Warnings: